Skip navigation

Due to being asked for my references by a few different people I thought I would post them up here so it’s all complete before I go travelling. It’s out of place on the blog I’m afraid but hopefully it will assist a few people who are researching the subject.

First is the general bibliography and then the specific numerical endnotes in order of chapter.

Bibliography

 

Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc.

Houellebecq, Michel (2005). The Possibility of an Island.London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

Howells, Carol Ann (2005). Margaret Atwood (second edition).New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Huxley, Aldous (2000). Brave New World Revisited. New York, Harper Collins Publishers Inc.

James, P.D (1992). The Children of Men.London, Faber and Faber.

Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc.

Little, Judith A ed. (2006). Feminist Philosophy and Science Fiction: Utopias and Dystopias.New York, Prometheus Books.

Lowry, Lois (1993). The Giver. New York, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.

McKee, Gabriel (2007). The Gospel According to Science Fiction: From the Twilight Zone to the Final Frontier. US,Westminster John Knox Press.

Moraru, Christian (Spring 2008). The Genomic Imperative: Michel Houellebecq’s The Possibility of an Island. Utopian Studies 19.2. 265 (19). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

Moylan, Tom (2000). Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia.United Kingdom, Westview Press.

Rabkin, Erik S, Greenberg, Martin H and Olander, Joseph D ed. (1983). No Place Else: Explorations in Utopian and Dystopian Fiction.USA, IL, SouthernIllinoisUniversity Press.

Seshendri, B (Feb 1995). Male Infertility and World Population. Contemporary Review 266 n.1549, 77 (5). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008.

Zamyatin, Yeugeny (1983). We. New York, Harper Collins Publishers Inc.

Refrences

Introduction:

1. Moylan, Tom (2000). Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia.United Kingdom, Westview Press. p. xii

2. Ibid. p. 126

3. . Bernal, J.D, The World, the Flesh and the Devil: An Inquiry into the Future of the three enemies of the rational soul. Within, Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p. 233-236

1. Brave New World: How Huxley Prophesised In Vitro Fertilisation and Human Conditioning:

1. Huxley, Aldous (2000). Brave New World Revisited. New York, Harper Collins Publishers Inc. pp. 1-2

2. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. pp. 242-243

3. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p.230. Information taken from Haldane, JBS (1924) Daedalus, or Science and the Future.

4. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p.230. Information taken from Haldane, JBS (1924) Daedalus, or Science and the Future. pp. 66-7.

5. Fukuyama, Francis (2002). Our Posthuman Future. Excerpts taken from ‘Sorry but your soul just died’ ; http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/may/13/health.highereducation, accessed March 2009.

6. Ibid.

7. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p.244. quoting from Huxley, Aldous ‘To the Puritans all things are Impure’ taken from Music at Night. pp. 180-181

8. Huxley, Aldous (2000). Brave New World Revisited. New York, Harper Collins Publishers Inc. p. 116

9. Piotrowski, Christa (2000). ‘Dark Chapter of American History: US Court Battle Over Sterilization’. http://www.commondreams.org/views/072100-106.htm . (July 21 2000) Neue ZuricherZeitung,Switzerland. Accessed March 2009.

10. Ibid.

11. Piotrowski, Christa (2000). ‘Dark Chapter of American History:US CourtBattleOver Sterilization’. http://www.commondreams.org/views/072100-106.htm . (July 21 2000) Neue ZuricherZeitung,Switzerland. Accessed March 2009.

12. Matter, William ‘On Brave New World’ within: Rabkin, Erik S, Greenberg, Martin H and Olander, Joseph D ed. (1983). No Place Else: Explorations in Utopian and Dystopian Fiction.USA, IL, SouthernIllinoisUniversity Press. p. 94

13. Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). ‘Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist’. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

14. Craig, Olga (2008) ‘IVF 30 Years on’. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3356528/IVF-30-years-on.html . (26 June 2008) Accessed March 2009.

15. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p.265

16. Warren, Mary Anne. ‘Sex Selection: Individual Choice or Cultural Coercion?’ Taken From; Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 138

17. Huxley, Aldous (1994). Brave New World.London, Flamingo. pp. 3-7

18. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p.246.

19. Goslinga-Roy, Gillian M (2000). ‘Body Boundaries, Fiction of the Female Self: An Ethnographic Perspective on Power, Feminism and the Reproductive Technologies’. Feminist Studies 26.1 (Spring 2000):113. Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

20. Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 14

21. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p. 256

22. Matter, William ‘On Brave New World’ within: Rabkin, Erik S, Greenberg, Martin H and Olander, Joseph D ed. (1983). No Place Else: Explorations in Utopian and Dystopian Fiction.USA, IL, SouthernIllinoisUniversity Press. p. 94

23. Ibid. p. 98

24. Lowry, Lois (1993). The Giver. New York, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc. p. 22

25. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p. 256

26. Ibid. p. 258

27. Ibid. p. 257.

28. Fukuyama, Francis (2002). Our Posthuman Future. Excerpts taken from ‘Sorry but your soul just died’ ; http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/may/13/health.highereducation, accessed March 2009.

29. Ibid.

2. The Possibility of an Island and Altering Humanity.

1. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p.256.

2. Moraru, Christian (Spring 2008). ‘The Genomic Imperative: Michel Houellebecq’s The Possibility of anIsland’. Utopian Studies 19.2. 265 (19). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

3. Ibid.

4. Houellebecq, Michel (2005). The Possibility of an Island.London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson. p. 48

5. Ibid. p. 141

6. Ibid. p. 311

7. McKee, Gabriel (2007). The Gospel According to Science Fiction: From the Twilight Zone to the Final Frontier. US,Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 55-56

8. Moraru, Christian (Spring 2008). ‘The Genomic Imperative: Michel Houellebecq’s The Possibility of anIsland’. Utopian Studies 19.2. 265 (19). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

9. Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. pp. 233-235

10. Bernal, J.D, The World, the Flesh and the Devil: An Inquiry into the Future of the three enemies of the rational soul. Within, Kumar, Krishan (1991). Utopia & Anti- Utopia in Modern Times. USA, MA, Basil Blackwell Inc. p. 233-236

11. Moraru, Christian (Spring 2008). ‘The Genomic Imperative: Michel Houellebecq’s The Possibility of anIsland’. Utopian Studies 19.2. 265 (19). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

12. Ibid.

13. Houellebecq, Michel (2005). The Possibility of an Island.London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson. p. 311

14. Laing, Jacqueline A (2006). ‘Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity’. The Monist 89.9 (Oct 2006):548 (19). Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

15. Moraru, Christian (Spring 2008). ‘The Genomic Imperative: Michel Houellebecq’s The Possibility of anIsland’. Utopian Studies 19.2. 265 (19). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

16. Laing, Jacqueline A (2006). ‘Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity’. The Monist 89.9 (Oct 2006):548 (19). Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

17. Harris, John. ‘Goodbye Dolly? The Ethics of Human Cloning’. Taken from; Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology.Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 147

18. Laing, Jacqueline A (2006). ‘Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity’. The Monist 89.9 (Oct 2006):548 (19). Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

19. Laing, Jacqueline A (2006). ‘Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity’. The Monist 89.9 (Oct 2006):548 (19). Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

20. Sample, Ian (2006). ‘The billionnaire and his cloning experts who have seen the future – and it’s fluffy’. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2006/may/11/stemcells.genetics accessed March 2009.

21. Ibid.

22. Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). ‘Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist’. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

23. Harris, John. ‘Is Gene Therapy a form of Eugenics?’ Taken from; Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 169

24. Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). ‘Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist’. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

25. Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). ‘Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 139

26. Ibid.

27. Ibid. p. 225

28. Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). ‘Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist’. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

29. Agar, Nicholas. ‘Liberal Eugenics’. Taken from; Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 172

30. Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 228

31. Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). ‘Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist’. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

32. Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 101

33. Ibid. p. 228

34. Goslinga-Roy, Gillian M (2000). ‘Body Boundaries, Fiction of the Female Self: An Ethnographic Perspective on Power, Feminism and the Reproductive Technologies’. Feminist Studies 26.1 (Spring 2000):113. Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

35. Harris, John. ‘Goodbye Dolly? The Ethics of Human Cloning’. Taken from; Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology.Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 145

36. Laing, Jacqueline A (2006). ‘Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity’. The Monist 89.9 (Oct 2006):548 (19). Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

37. Warren, Mary Anne. ‘Sex Selection: Individual choice or Cultural Coercion?’ Taken From; Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. pp. 137-138

38. Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 225

3. Exploring Issues of Surrogacy, Fertility and Population in The Handmaid’s Tale and The Children of Men:

1. Purdy, Laura M. ‘Surrogate Mothering: Exploitation or Empowerment?’ Taken from: Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 103

2. DiQuinzio, Patrice (1999). The Impossibility of Motherhood.New York, Routledge. p. 250

3. Atwood, Margaret (1995). The Handmaid’s Tale.London, Virago Press. p. 83.

4. Purdy, Laura M. ‘Surrogate Mothering: Exploitation or Empowerment?’ Taken from: Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 103

5. Little, Judith A ed. (2006). Feminist Philosophy and Science Fiction: Utopias and Dystopias.New York, Prometheus Books. p. 16

6. Le Guin, Ursula K (1969). The Left Hand of Darkness. New York, Walker and Company. p. 68. Taken from; Little, Judith A ed. (2006). Feminist Philosophy and Science Fiction: Utopias and Dystopias.New York, Prometheus Books. p. 207

7. McKee, Gabriel (2007). The Gospel According to Science Fiction: From the Twilight Zone to the Final Frontier. US,Westminster John Knox Press. p. 208

8. Atwood, Margaret, ‘MS collection 200’ (unpublished). Taken From Howells, Carol Ann (2005). Margaret Atwood (second edition).New York, Palgrave Macmillan. p. 94

9. Howells, Carol Ann (2005). Margaret Atwood (second edition).New York, Palgrave Macmillan. p. 93

10. McKee, Gabriel (2007). The Gospel According to Science Fiction: From the Twilight Zone to the Final Frontier. US,Westminster John Knox Press. p. 208

11. Goslinga-Roy, Gillian M (2000). ‘Body Boundaries, Fiction of the Female Self: An Ethnographic Perspective on Power, Feminism and the Reproductive Technologies’. Feminist Studies 26.1 (Spring 2000):113. Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

12. Ibid.

13. Purdy, Laura M. ‘Surrogate Mothering: Exploitation or Empowerment?’ Taken from: Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 104

14. Ibid. p. 106

15. Purdy, Laura M. ‘Are Pregnant Women Fetal Containers?’ Taken from: Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 71

16. Purdy, Laura M. ‘Surrogate Mothering: Exploitation or Empowerment?’ Taken from: Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter ed. (2000). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell Publications Inc. p. 74

17. Howells, Carol Ann (2005). Margaret Atwood (second edition).New York, Palgrave Macmillan. p. 107

18. Wolf, Susan M (1996) Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction.New York, Routledge. p. 55

19. Ibid.

20. James, P.D (1992). The Children of Men.London, Faber and Faber. p. 134

21. Houellebecq, Michel (2005). The Possibility of an Island.London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson. p. 311

22. James, P.D (1992). The Children of Men.London, Faber and Faber. p. 119

23. Ibid. p. 41

24. Seshendri, B (Feb 1995). ‘Male Infertility and World Population’. Contemporary Review 266 n.1549, 77 (5). Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008.

25. Ibid.

26. Ibid.

27. Ibid

28. Jowit, Juliette (2007) ‘Three’s a Crowd’. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/nov/11/features.magazine. Printed November 11th 2007, Accessed April 2009.

29. Fukuyama, Francis (2002). Our Posthuman Future. Excerpts taken from ‘Sorry but your soul just died’ ; http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/may/13/health.highereducation, accessed March 2009.

30. Ibid

Conclusion:

1. Blank, Robert and Merrick, Janna c. (1995). Human Reproduction, Emerging Technologies, and Conflicting Rights.Washington D.C, Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 216

2. Baird, Stephen L (April 2007). ‘Designer Babies, Eugenics Repackaged or Consumer Option? The forces pushing humanity towards attempts at self modification, through biological and technological advances, are seductive ones that we will be hard pressed to resist’. The Technology Teacher :12 (5) Academic One File, Gale.YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 1/12/2008

3. Laing, Jacqueline A (2006). ‘Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity’. The Monist 89.9 (Oct 2006):548 (19). Academic OneFile. Gale. YorkSt JohnUniversity. Accessed 14th December 2008.

4. DiQuinzio, Patrice (1999). The Impossibility of Motherhood.New York, Routledge. p. 250

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers

%d bloggers like this: